Add a demo for MASTG-TEST-0231 (References to Logging APIs) #3948
dchapagain
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Hi @deepagain81, I got a proposal for you. It seems that MASTG-DEMO-0006 is missing some APIs. Would you like to open a PR first to update that demo? After that's all done and merged we can consider a new PR where you can reuse the kotlin file for the new static demo. Please read our contribution guidelines and content guidelines https://mas.owasp.org/contributing/writing-content/ First of all you'll need to create an issue for the update and get it assigned. Thank you! |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I noticed MASTG-TEST-0231 does not have a demo yet. I would be interested in adding one. My idea is to create a static Semgrep demo built on the MASTestApp, with a MastgTest.kt sample that covers the logging APIs listed on the test (
android.util.Log,Logger,System.out.print,System.err.print,Throwable.printStackTrace). I would also add a new rule underrules/and include the reversed Java generated by the extraction script.I am a Software Engineer, mostly React Native with native Kotlin modules (Android). I already have a working local setup: MASTestApp builds and runs on an API 35 AVD, and jadx/apktool/semgrep are in place.
Before I start, I wanted to check one thing. PR #3592 is currently a draft and updates some of the terminology in this area, such as using "authenticators" instead of "secrets" and "user sensitive data". Should I write against the current master, or align with the wording in that PR?
All reactions